🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."